Morningstar

Robeco QI Emerging Cnsrv Eqs G $

Analyst Report
Morningstar's Take
|08/01/2024
by Francesco Paganelli
In a surprise announcement, Robeco's CIO of fixed income and sustainability Victor Verberk left the asset manager on 5 June 2023 to pursue other opportunities. Verberk joined Robeco in 2008 as head of investment-grade credit and co-head, along with Sander Bus, of the credit portfolio management team. He was promoted to CIO of fixed income and sustainability in 2020 and was a member of Robeco's executive committee since 2017. At the time of his departure, he was also a named portfolio manager on the Robeco Global Credits, Robeco Euro Credits, and RobecoSAM SDG Credit Income strategies.

Going forward, Mark van der Kroft, who has been CIO of fundamental and quant equity since September 2020, will add the fixed-income and sustainability CIO responsibilities to his plate as the firm moves forward with only one CIO.

At this stage, we are making no changes to our Parent Pillar rating of Above Average as a result of the leadership change.

 
Robeco QI Emerging Conservative Equities adopts a repeatable, disciplined, and well-conceived approach to harvest the low-volatility factor. Its process is rooted in empirical research and is consistently enhanced by a large, experienced, and stable outfit of talented specialists in systematic investing.

Robeco's quantitative-based conservative equities range is managed by a six-member team led by Pim van Vliet, whose academic work has laid the conceptual foundation of the strategy's investment philosophy. This stable and experienced management team is well-supported by more than a dozen quant analysts, headed by David Blitz and Weili Zhou, who are dedicated to research and development. This credentialed unit is vital to the fund's success as it constantly refines the systematic process employed across the firm’s conservative range. All in all, Robeco's broader quant team is one of the best-equipped organizations in the systematic field; over time, it has successfully groomed young quant researchers in its talent pool, allowing them to add people with complementary skills to the teams. The group continued to expand in 2022 with a few experienced hires, further strengthening and expanding its capabilities.

The strategy's key attractions include its academic foundation, repeatability, and disciplined execution. The rules-based, systematic process is centered around a proprietary stock-selection model that itself is built on empirical research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to superior risk-adjusted returns. The strategy goes beyond traditional low-volatility investing, though, by combining value, quality, sentiment, and momentum signals to enhance the overall risk/reward profile. The team aims to own the highest-ranked stocks and keep portfolio turnover to a minimum, whereas portfolio construction is driven by an optimization algorithm to ensure sufficient diversification. The group's continuous efforts in researching and developing new signals and systems have resulted in several incremental enhancements to the model over the years. The team strikes a balance between a straightforward factor implementation and the addition of complementary signals to improve the funds' alpha potential, but the process has many moving parts, which increases overall complexity to some extent.

The strategy ultimately aims to win by not losing. It has been able to reduce risk as expected, though its results versus the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index have been less consistent. The strategy's weak 2020 results were disappointing, but that wasn't unique among peers with a similar risk factor profile, even if it illustrates the strategy’s vulnerability to sharp factor reversals. That said, in our view the strategy's long-term alpha potential remains intact, as evidenced by its strong comeback in recent years. Overall, the fund remains a sound and reliable option in this space.
 
Morningstar Medalist Rating™A strong option for investors seeking a more defensive play on emerging-markets equity.
To find out how Morningstar rates a fund click here.
Morningstar Pillars
PeopleHigh
ParentAbove Average
ProcessAbove Average
 
Morningstar Medalist RatingMorningstar assigns the Medalist Rating to funds that are qualitatively and quantitatively assessed through manager research and algorithmic processes. The assessment turns on three key “pillars” – People, Process, and Parent – that yield an estimate of how well a fund will perform before fees but after adjusting for risk.
Morningstar reserve its rights to charge for access to these Ratings and/or Rating report.
Permissions/Reprints   E-mail Morningstar     
In order to provide consistency across the report data provided by different Asset Managers, the calculated data points presented are generated using Morningstar’s proprietary calculation methodology which is set out in more detail at(https://www.morningstar.com/research/signature)
© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.