Lindsell Train Global Equity D GBP Inc |
Morningstar's Take
|09/07/2024by Daniel Haydon
| Lindsell Train has appointed long-standing analysts Madeline Deguchi-Wright and Ben Van Leeuwen as deputy portfolio managers on the UK equity and global equity fund. They had each become more involved in these mandates in recent years. This step formalizes their working relationships with Nick Train (UK and Global), Michael Lindsell (Global and Japan), and James Bullock (Global and North America). Elsewhere, Alexander Windsor-Clive was also promoted to deputy portfolio manager on the North American equity strategy. The analysts maintain their generalist equity research responsibilities. These promotions mark a step in the right direction regarding long-term succession planning. This is an area that has begun to hold back our conviction, particularly on the UK equity fund, where Nick Train has been lead manager since inception and where there had until now been little by way of firm plans. The global mandate is still managed by the trio of lead portfolio managers, Train, Lindsell, and Bullock, which decreases key-person risk there relative to the UK and Japan products. There remains a significant disparity in experience levels between the analysts/deputy managers and the lead managers—the founders have over 40 years of experience. It is nonetheless reassuring to see some progress. Finally, there have also been some changes to the management committee at this boutique. Nick Train and company secretary Michael Lim have both stepped off the committee. Prior head of marketing and client servicing Keith Wilson retired at the end of January 2024, at which time he also stepped off the committee. There were no additions, so the management committee is now more focused and comprises Lindsell (CEO & portfolio manager), Bullock (portfolio manager), Joss Saunders (COO), and Jessica Cameron (head of marketing and client services). This, too, shows some evolution in terms of longtime succession planning at the firm level. There is reportedly increased focus on spreading share ownership, though this remains in early stages, and ownership is primarily held by founders Train and Lindsell and the Lindsell Train investment trust. This note was updated to clarify Alexander Windsor-Clive's promotion. |
| Lindsell Train Global Equity’s distinct investment philosophy is attractive, and the fund continues to benefit from some veteran comanagers. However, conviction in the application of the process has diminished. We think there could be better consideration of opportunity costs and also better evaluation of management quality. The geographic biases have also proved painful. We, nonetheless, recognize the helpful defensive qualities of the fund, which can serve a useful role within a diversified portfolio. We also appreciate that narrow market leadership has been unkind to the fund in recent years. This has not been the only negative factor, and we think the fund’s competitive positioning within its cohort has diminished. This leads to a downgrade to the Process Pillar rating to Average from Above Average. The People Pillar retains its Above Average rating. Lindsell Train co-founders Michael Lindsell and Nick Train apply their investment approach to a global opportunity set. Both have more than 30 years' experience, including several years managing global equity portfolios prior to launching this strategy in 2011. They are joined by comanager James Bullock; while less experienced, he has been contributing to the portfolio since joining Lindsell Train in 2010. The investment philosophy lies in the belief that a highly concentrated portfolio of high-quality, cash-generative, strong, and easily understood business franchises will outperform the market and reduce volatility over the long term. The managers use strict criteria aligned to this belief to significantly pare down the universe. Qualifying stocks are subject to in-depth fundamental analysis by the managers and four supporting analysts. Given the restricted investable universe and the managers' long experience, we find the team sufficiently resourced. A strength resides in Lindsell and Train's deep understanding of company strategy and the value of intellectual property. The managers’ ability to see through the noise and hold stocks that are best placed to defend their business over the long term has long been seen as a key positive, but the buy and hold approach is accompanied by considerations relating to sell discipline, and this has proved painful more recently when opportunity cost is considered. This is made more important by the highly concentrated, stock-specific, and unconstrained approach. The sizable regional and sector deviations from the category index have long been a feature, and the UK and Japan have been permanent overweightings. Elsewhere, there is a low technology weighting, given that the managers feel these relatively newer businesses can significantly change their strategies as they develop. They prefer firms with a long and consistent heritage and strong brands or intellectual property. At times, companies’ strategic mishaps have hampered the ability for the fund to fully capture the long-term value from this. Recent performance has failed to keep up with the category or global growth indexes. Some of this is explainable: Naturally, the fund is not exposed to the very high growth stocks that have led the market. There has, nonetheless, been a negative relative impact from areas of the portfolio. That includes Japanese holdings in consumer staples companies that have been hit by the double-edged sword of Japanese yen depreciation and weakness in their exposure to the China consumer. This may prove to be cyclical but has been very painful. Elsewhere, long-standing holdings in beverage companies Diageo and Brown Forman detracted. They faced stocking issues that some argue are symptomatic of changing consumer habits, large margins. Holdings in Hargreaves Lansdown and the position in Pearson sold in 2022 have also weighed on returns. We recognize that some positions have worked very well over the last five years, however, including Nintendo, Intuit, London Stock Exchange, RELX, and FICO. After years of significant net inflows, the strategy experienced net outflows in recent years. This brings with it different behavioral biases, which we monitor. Assets (including segregated mandates) stood at around GBP 8.6 billion at the end of May 2024. Considerations on capacity are less prominent now than they once were. The managers’ ability to execute the process and their approach to competition for capital in the fund still require monitoring. |
Reduced conviction in the process, but we recognize the useful defensive properties. To find out how Morningstar rates a fund click here.
| Morningstar Pillars | |
| People | Above Average |
| Parent | Below Average |
| Process | Average |
Morningstar Medalist RatingMorningstar assigns the Medalist Rating to funds that are qualitatively and quantitatively assessed through manager research and algorithmic processes. The assessment turns on three key “pillars” – People, Process, and Parent – that yield an estimate of how well a fund will perform before fees but after adjusting for risk.
|
| Morningstar reserve its rights to charge for access to these Ratings and/or Rating report. |
|
| Permissions/Reprints E-mail Morningstar |
